nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 01, v.55 66-72
Effects of Bacterial Wilt-Resistant Varieties and Seed Coatings on the Prevention and Control of Soil-Borne Diseases in Peanuts
Email: rirongxu@163.com;
DOI: 10.14001/j.issn.1002-4093.2026.01.008
Abstract:

In this study, the control effects of three bacterial wilt-resistant peanut varieties combining with seed coatings and bio-control agents on the soil-borne diseases were investigated. Observations and analyses were conducted on the seedling emergence rate, disease incidence rate at initial and mid-flowering stages, biological traits of mature plants, and pod yield per plot. The results showed that the average seedling emergence rate of peanuts ranged from 83.33% to 99.17%. The incidence of soil-borne diseases in the initial flowering stage of peanuts ranged from 0.00% to 2.73%, with the lowest disease incidence in the Trichoderma treatment and the highest in the control, with no significant difference between treatments. The disease incidence in the mid-flowering stage ranged from 2.92% to 14.17%, with the lowest disease incidence in the seed coating of Liangdun treatment and the highest in the control, with no significant difference between treatments. Among the varieties, the disease incidence of variety Kanghuang1 was the lowest, and that of variety Fuhua3 was the highest, and the variety Fuhua3 showed significant differences in disease incidence comparing to other varieties. The compound bacterium agent treatment significantly promoted peanut main stem height and lateral branch length, while increasing pod mass and kernel mass per plant. The Trichoderma treatment enhanced the fruit-bearing branch rate, total number of pods, full-fruit rate, double-kernel pod rate, 100-pod mass, 100-kernel mass, and kernel-fruit ratio. In contrast, the seed coating Liangdun treatment reduced 100-pod mass and 100-kernel mass, significantly decreased the full-fruit rate and double-kernel pod rate, and resulted in lower pod mass and kernel mass per plant. All treatments increased peanut pod yield compared to the control treatment. Seed coating Liangdun achieved the highest pod yield as 2 505.43 kg/ha, showing significant differences with other treatments. Among varieties, Kanghuang1 exhibited the highest pod yield as 2 651.0 kg/ha, with significant differences comparing to other varieties. Among the two treatment combinations, the top three yield combinations were the variety Kanghuang1 treated with seed coating Liangdun, compound bacterium agent, and Trichoderma, with yields of 3 721.8, 2 887.22 and 2 383.46 kg/ha, respectively. In conclusion, Kanghuang1 was identified as a soil-borne disease-resistant variety among the three peanut bacterial wilt-resistant varieties, which demonstrated compatibility with multiple seed treatments, with the seed coating Liangdun showing the most effective synergy.

References

[1] 王瑞元.2022年我国粮油产销和进出口情况[J].中国油脂,2023,48(6):1-7.

[2] 廖伯寿.我国花生生产发展现状与潜力分析[J].中国油料作物学报,2020,42(2):161-166.

[3] 曹坳程,张大琪,方文生,等.土传病害防治技术进展及面临的挑战[J].植物保护,2023,49(5):260-269.

[4] 何亚登.2种生防菌的发酵、土壤定殖及防治烟草土传病害的研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2019.

[5] HAN S Y,CHEN J X,ZHAO Y J,et al.Bacillus subtilis HSY21 can reduce soybean root rot and inhibit the expression of genes related to the pathogenicity of Fusarium oxysporum[J].Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,2021,178:104916.DOI:10.1016/j.pestbp.2021.104916.

[6] GULLINO M L,GARIBALDI A,GAMLIEL A,et al.Soil disinfestation:From soil treatment to soil and plant health[J].Plant Disease,2022,106(6):1541-1554.

[7] 李会珍,赵文志,张剑民,等.生物种衣剂对作物种子发芽及苗期生理特性的影响[J].种子,2009,28(3):49-51.

[8] 巩彪,张丽丽,隋申利,等.大蒜秸秆对番茄根结线虫病及根际微生态的影响[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(5):933-941.

[9] 牛秀群,李金花,张俊莲,等.甘肃省干旱灌区连作马铃薯根际土壤中镰刀菌的变化[J].草业学报,2011,20(4):236-243.

[10] 李金玉,刘桂英.良种包衣新产品—药肥复合型种衣剂[J].种子,1990(6):53-56.

[11] 吴学宏,刘西莉,王红梅,等.我国种衣剂的研究进展[J].农药,2003(5):1-5.

[12] 谢阳姣,吕凤连,戴罗杰,等.种子包衣对微胚乳玉米种子发芽过程中生理生化变化的影响[J].玉米科学,2009,17(6):53-55,59.

[13] MA Z,FENG H J,YANG C Z,et al.Integrated microbiology and metabolomics analysis reveal responses of cotton rhizosphere microbiome and metabolite spectrum to conventional seed coating agents[J].Environmental Pollution,2023,333:122058.DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122058.

[14] MALGIOGLIO G,RIZZO G F,NIGRO S,et al.Plant-microbe interaction in sustainable agriculture:The factors that may influence the efficacy of PGPM application[J].Sustainability,2022,14(4):2253.DOI:10.3390/su14042253.

[15] 李晴晴,徐松,赵维,等.根际微生物组介导的解淀粉芽孢杆菌FH-1对水稻的促生机制[J].微生物学报,2019,59(12):2410-2426.

[16] CUI W Y,HE P J,MUNIR S,et al.Efficacy of plant growth promoting bacteria Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B9601-Y2 for biocontrol of southern corn leaf blight[J].Biological Control,2019,139:104080.DOI:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.10408.

[17] QIAN S X,AHMED A,HE P B,et al.Bacillus amyloliquefaciens AK-12 helps rapeseed establish a protection against Brevicoryne brassicae[J].International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2023,24(21):15893.DOI:10.3390/ijms242115893.

[18] LUO L,ZHAO C Z,WANG E T,et al.Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as an excellent agent for biofertilizer and biocontrol in agriculture:An overview for its mechanisms[J].Microbiological Research,2022,259:127016.DOI:10.1016/j.micres.2022.127016.

[19] 李会珍,赵文志,张剑民,等.生物种衣剂对作物种子发芽及苗期生理特性的影响[J].种子,2009,28(3):49-51.

[20] 吉庆勋,韩松,王娟,等.小麦、玉米种衣剂副作用研究进展[J].农药,2013,52(12):865-867.

[21] CHRISTOS I R,EBRAHIM M K,NAVED S.Response of local and commercial tomato cultivars and rootstocks to Meloidogyne javanica infestation[J].Australian Journal of Crop Science,2011,5(11):1388-1395.

[22] FANG X L,PHILLIPS D,VERHEYEN G,et al.Yields and resistance of strawberry cultivars to crown and root diseases in the field,and cultivar responses to pathogens under controlled environment conditions[J].Phytopathologia Mediterranea,2012,51(1):69-84.

[23] OGAI R,KANDA-HOJO A,TSUDA S.An attenuated isolate of Pepper mild mottle virus for cross protection of cultivated green pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) carrying the L3 resistance gene[J].Crop Protection,2013,54:29-34.

[24] P??REZ-JIM??NEZ R M,DE CAL A,MELGAREJO P,et al.Resistance of several strawberry cultivars against three different pathogens[J].Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research,2012,10(2):502-512.

[25] 甘林,代玉立,杨秀娟,等.香蕉抗(感)病品种根系分泌物对枯萎病菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的生物效应[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(7):2279-2286.

[26] LI X G,ZHANG T L,WANG X X,et al.The composition of root exudates from two different resistant peanut cultivars and their effects on the growth of soil-borne pathogen[J].International Journal of Biological Sciences,2013,9(2):164-173.

[27] 张敏.光果甘草连作对土壤微生物群落结构及根腐病病原菌影响的研究[D].石河子:石河子大学,2021.

[28] 宋万朵,晏立英,于东洋,等.快速高效鉴定花生青枯病抗性的水培接种新方法研究[J].植物病理学报,2024,54(1):204-208.

[29] 董艳,董坤,郑毅,等.不同抗性蚕豆品种根系分泌物对枯萎病菌的化感作用及根系分泌物组分分析[J].中国生态农业学报,2014,22(3):292-299.

[30] STEVENSON P C,PADGHAM D E,HAWARE M P.Root exudates associated with the resistance of four chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum) to two races of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.cicero[J].Plant Pathology,1995,44(4):686-694.

Basic Information:

DOI:10.14001/j.issn.1002-4093.2026.01.008

China Classification Code:S435.652

Citation Information:

[1]XU Rirong,CHEN Hao,CHEN Xiangyu.Effects of Bacterial Wilt-Resistant Varieties and Seed Coatings on the Prevention and Control of Soil-Borne Diseases in Peanuts[J].Journal of Peanut Science,2026,55(01):66-72.DOI:10.14001/j.issn.1002-4093.2026.01.008.

Fund Information:

福建省属公益类科研院所专项(2022R1031004)

quote

GB/T 7714-2015
MLA
APA
Search Advanced Search